From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The retained Crossref abstract describes how gig platforms use algorithmically mediated customer ratings to control workers’ future opportunities and how workers adapt resistance across stages of the labor process.
Scope: abstract-level evidence from comparative platform-company ethnography
The publisher issue listing places this paper in the special issue on emerging technologies and organizing, and its preview abstract examines control and resistance in digital platform companies that organize work without traditional managers.
Scope: publisher TOC preview abstract
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (3)
Cited by (11)
- Algorithmic management in the gig economy: A systematic review and research integration
- Algorithmic surveillance and workers’ compliance: The role of trust, privacy concerns, and fairness in online crowdwork
- Constructing Envelopes: How Institutional Custodians Can Tame Disruptive Algorithms
- Algorithmic management and worker agency: The platform perspective on algoactivism
- Algorithms and their Affordances: How Crowdworkers Manage Algorithmic Scores in Online Labour Markets
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
- Algorithmic Embeddedness and the ‘Gig’ Characteristics Model: Examining the Interplay between Technology and Work Design in Crowdwork
- Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human‐Algorithm Relations
- The Making of the “Good Bad” Job: How Algorithmic Management Manufactures Consent Through Constant and Confined Choices
- Perceived algorithmic evaluation and app‐workers' service performance: The roles of flow experience and challenges of gig work
- Flexing and floundering in the on-demand economy: Narrative identity construction under algorithmic management
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref abstract-level metadata only; the publisher surface returned HTTP 403; full text was not inspected
- The retained manifestation is a bounded Crossref search response rather than an exact-DOI response
- Crossref supplied only year and month for the issue publication date
- Publisher TOC preview abstract is truncated; full text was not inspected.
- Special-issue membership is established by the issue section heading.
Source independence
publisher-only