From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract reports that app-workers’ perceived algorithmic evaluation is positively related to flow experience and service performance and that viability challenges weaken those relationships.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata observed 2026-08-20
The abstract links app-workers’ perceived algorithmic evaluation to flow and service performance, with gig-work viability challenges weakening those relationships.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (4)
- Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings
- Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy
- The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Cited by (1)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref public API abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
- The public abstract reports interviews and surveys but does not state sample denominators or periods.
- Publisher HTML was not inspected after a representative Wiley DOI page returned HTTP 403.
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only