From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract describes a systematic review of multidisciplinary scholarship on algorithmic management of gig workers and integrates its dimensions, mechanisms, boundary conditions, and worker outcomes in an input-process-output framework.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata observed 2026-08-20
The review integrates multidisciplinary algorithmic-management research into an organizational-behavior framework explaining gig-worker outcomes and mechanisms.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (10)
- Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- Algorithmic Surveillance in the Gig Economy: The Organization of Work through Lefebvrian Conceived Space
- The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations
- Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings
- Using machine learning to translate applicant work history into predictors of performance and turnover.
- Algorithm Aversion: Evidence from Ridesharing Drivers
- A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice
- The role of organizational settings in social learning: An ethnographic focus on food-delivery platform work
- Flexing and floundering in the on-demand economy: Narrative identity construction under algorithmic management
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref public API abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
- The public abstract does not state the review-corpus denominator.
- Publisher HTML was not inspected after a representative Wiley DOI page returned HTTP 403.
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only