From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
For 509 publicly listed US firms observed from 2009 through 2020, the abstract reports an inverted-U relationship between firm AI adoption and employee job satisfaction, with exploration orientation and data governance moderating the relationship.
Scope: publisher-deposited abstract metadata observed 2026-08-20
The abstract links firm AI adoption to competing job-enrichment and impairment effects, with organizational strategies shaping employee job satisfaction.
Scope: abstract-level
The publisher issue roster identifies an article on firm AI adoption and employee job satisfaction.
Scope: publisher issue-roster title and article-type metadata
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (9)
- Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
- To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis
- Algorithmic Embeddedness and the ‘Gig’ Characteristics Model: Examining the Interplay between Technology and Work Design in Crowdwork
- Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
- The Crowdless Future? Generative AI and Creative Problem-Solving
- When and How Artificial Intelligence Augments Employee Creativity
- Using Augmentation-Based AI Tool at Work: A Daily Investigation of Learning-Based Benefit and Challenge
- The Short-Term Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Employment: Evidence from an Online Labor Market
Cited by (1)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref public API abstract-level evidence only; full text was not inspected.
- Publisher HTML was not inspected after a representative Wiley DOI page returned HTTP 403.
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
- The direct Wiley TOC returned HTTP 403; the retained public-search rendering supplied title, authors, date, pages, and article type.
- No abstract or full text was inspected, so the claim is limited to title-level metadata.
- Crossref DOI corroboration is retained in crossref_jms_ai_issue_bibliographic.json (SHA256 09f2707e67de2b15634dbce1ffaf62481bbe901ddaf6efdc4981f1abf86ba8c7).
Source independence
corroborated:crossref-api-metadata