From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The work concerns procedural-justice implications of algorithmic bias reduction in human-resource decisions.
Scope: title-level metadata; abstract not inspected
The title identifies procedural-justice consequences of algorithmic reductionism in human-resource decisions.
Scope: title-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (0)
No in-corpus outgoing citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Cited by (10)
- Combining Human and Artificial Intelligence: Hybrid Problem-Solving in Organizations
- Navigating AI Convergence in Human–Artificial Intelligence Teams: A Signaling Theory Approach
- Flexing and floundering in the on-demand economy: Narrative identity construction under algorithmic management
- The Role of Human Managers within Algorithmic Performance Management Systems: A Process Model of Employee Trust in Managers through Reflexivity
- The transparency dilemma: How AI disclosure erodes trust
- Problematizing the role of artificial intelligence in hiring and organizational inequalities: A multidisciplinary review
- Algorithmic surveillance and workers’ compliance: The role of trust, privacy concerns, and fairness in online crowdwork
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
- Constructing Envelopes: How Institutional Custodians Can Tame Disruptive Algorithms
- A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref supplied bibliographic metadata but no abstract.
- Scope and claim are limited to the title-level description.
- Crossref supplied only year and month, so published_date is null rather than an inferred day.
- Crossref title metadata only; an abstract was not present in the retained response and full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only