From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Crossref records this Academy of Management Review article under a title proposing a theory of control-accountability alignment among AI developers and users.
Scope: title-and-bibliographic-metadata only
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (10)
- In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms
- To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms
- Substituting Human Decision-Making with Machine Learning: Implications for Organizational Learning
- Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks
- Ironies of automation
- Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation-Augmentation Paradox
- Competitive Advantage Through Artificial Intelligence: Toward a Theory of Situated AI
- “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a System View to Explore the Future of Work
Cited by (2)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref supplies a 2026-04 issue date but no day-level published date, so published_date is null
- Crossref bibliographic metadata only; the publisher page was access-blocked and full text was not inspected
- Scope inclusion rests on title-level organizational relevance; substantive claims were not coded
Source independence
publisher-only