From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The title describes situated and algorithmic modes of knowledge work through workplace jurisdiction.
Scope: title-level metadata
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (8)
- To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis
- Substituting Human Decision-Making with Machine Learning: Implications for Organizational Learning
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks
- Losing Touch: An Embodiment Perspective on Coordination in Robotic Surgery
- When Knowledge Work and Analytical Technologies Collide: The Practices and Consequences of Black Boxing Algorithmic Technologies
- The System of Professions
- In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms
Cited by (1)
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref supplied no abstract; the claim is limited to title-level metadata and bibliographic fields.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only