From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract links AI control over workplace decisions to stress and describes human–AI team processes as resources that can reduce or buffer that stress.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (9)
- When and How Artificial Intelligence Augments Employee Creativity
- Human-AI Ensembles: When Can They Work?
- Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
- The rise of robots increases job insecurity and maladaptive workplace behaviors: Multimethod evidence.
- No person is an island: Unpacking the work and after-work consequences of interacting with artificial intelligence.
- Taming Artificial Intelligence: A Theory of Control-Accountability Alignment among AI Developers and Users
- Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
- A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice
- The Crowdless Future? Generative AI and Creative Problem-Solving
Cited by (0)
No in-corpus incoming citation is available in the current enrichment coverage.
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only