From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The title connects conscientious employees with intelligent machines through complementarity and role perspectives.
Scope: title-level metadata
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (4)
Cited by (9)
- AI‐Augmented Leadership: How, Why, and When Leaders' Collaboration With AI Enhances Team Performance
- Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
- The Dark Side of Managing Human–AI Collaborations: Implications for Leaders’ Moral Relativism and Unethical Behaviour
- Using Augmentation-Based AI Tool at Work: A Daily Investigation of Learning-Based Benefit and Challenge
- Fading Memories: The Role of Machine Learning in Organizational Knowledge Depreciation
- Gain or Pain: The Double‐Edged Sword Effect of Artificial Intelligence Adoption on Employee Service Performance
- When AI Becomes My Teammate: Unpacking How Employees Perceive and Collaborate With Gendered AI Teammates
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms, and Robots Through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref supplied no abstract; the claim is limited to title-level metadata and bibliographic fields.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only