From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
Crossref records this Academy of Management Annals article under a title reviewing empirical research on human trust in artificial intelligence.
Scope: title-and-bibliographic-metadata only
The title identifies a review of empirical research on human trust in artificial intelligence.
Scope: title-level metadata
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (1)
Cited by (28)
- When AI Becomes My Teammate: Unpacking How Employees Perceive and Collaborate With Gendered AI Teammates
- Beyond Anthropomorphism: Social Presence in Human–AI Collaboration Processes
- Bodily Data Control, Human Agency Threats, and Job Insecurity
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms, and Robots Through the Lens of Stakeholder Theory
- Backfiring AI? AI Deployment in Workplace
- To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis
- The Acceleration of Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Organization and Work in an Era of Rapid Technological Change
- Using Augmentation-Based AI Tool at Work: A Daily Investigation of Learning-Based Benefit and Challenge
- When Do Individuals Believe in Themselves Rather Than in Artificial Intelligence? Insights from Longitudinal Investigations in Corporate Credit‐Rating Contexts
- More to Lose: The Adverse Effect of High Performance Ranking on Employees’ Preimplementation Attitudes Toward the Integration of Powerful AI Aids
- Artificial Intelligence, Trust, and Perceptions of Agency
- Incentives, Framing, and Reliance on Algorithmic Advice: An Experimental Study
- In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms
- You, Me, and the AI: The Role of Third‐Party Human Teammates for Trust Formation Toward AI Teammates
- When Conscientious Employees Meet Intelligent Machines: An Integrative Approach Inspired by Complementarity Theory and Role Theory
- How Can Teams Benefit From AI Team Members? Exploring the Effect of Generative AI on Decision-Making Processes and Decision Quality in Team–AI Collaboration
- Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism
- The Role of Human Managers within Algorithmic Performance Management Systems: A Process Model of Employee Trust in Managers through Reflexivity
- Artificial Intelligence at Work: An Integrative Perspective on the Impact of AI on Workplace Inequality
- A colleague named Max: A critical inquiry into affects when an anthropomorphised AI (ro)bot enters the workplace
- The Cybernetic Teammate: A Field Experiment on Generative AI Reshaping Teamwork and Expertise
- Navigating AI Convergence in Human–Artificial Intelligence Teams: A Signaling Theory Approach
- Knowing Enough to Be Dangerous: The Problem of “Artificial Certainty” for Expert Authority When Using AI for Decision Making and Planning
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
- The transparency dilemma: How AI disclosure erodes trust
- It's Amazing – But Terrifying!: Unveiling the Combined Effect of Emotional and Cognitive Trust on Organizational Member' Behaviours, AI Performance, and Adoption
- The Generative AI Dilemma in Knowledge-Intensive Teams
- Human-AI Ensembles: When Can They Work?
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Crossref supplies a 2020-07 issue date but no day-level published date, so published_date is null
- Retained Crossref query-page metadata only; no exact work refetch was made and full text was not inspected
- Scope inclusion rests on title-level organizational relevance; substantive claims were not coded
- Crossref supplied no abstract; the claim is limited to title-level metadata and bibliographic fields.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only