From the hash-bound evidence releases
Recorded claims
Each claim states what the inspected source says, at the recorded location—bounded by its scope and graded by its confidence. Nothing here is a synthesis across works.
The abstract reports that how investment-bank teams validate analytical technologies affects whether they black-box embedded algorithms, with consequences for knowledge outputs and the development of junior workers’ expertise.
Scope: abstract-level investment-bank team study
The abstract reports that different validation practices in an investment bank shaped whether workers black-boxed analytical algorithms, with consequences for knowledge outputs and junior expertise.
Scope: abstract-level
Structured relationships
In-corpus citations
Only source-supplied cites relationships whose two endpoints are admitted are shown. Invocation evidence remains a separate relationship.
Cites (4)
Cited by (21)
- Producing Images and Making Judgement: The ongoing use of epistemic technologies in expert work
- The Generative AI Dilemma in Knowledge-Intensive Teams
- How Professionals Adapt to Artificial Intelligence: The Role of Intertwined Boundary Work
- Knowing Enough to Be Dangerous: The Problem of “Artificial Certainty” for Expert Authority When Using AI for Decision Making and Planning
- Syncing Minds and Machines: Hybrid Cognitive Alignment as an Emergent Coordination Mechanism in Human-AI Collaboration
- Combining Human and Artificial Intelligence: Hybrid Problem-Solving in Organizations
- When AI Becomes My Teammate: Unpacking How Employees Perceive and Collaborate With Gendered AI Teammates
- Managing with Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Framework
- Accommodating Machine Learning Algorithms in Professional Service Firms
- ‘Let Me Explain’: A Comparative Field Study on How Experts Enact Authority Over Clients When Facing AI Decisions
- Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism
- “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a System View to Explore the Future of Work
- The Acceleration of Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Organization and Work in an Era of Rapid Technological Change
- Constructing Envelopes: How Institutional Custodians Can Tame Disruptive Algorithms
- Artificial Intelligence as an Organizing Capability Arising from Human‐Algorithm Relations
- In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King: Knowledge Brokerage in the Age of Learning Algorithms
- Interlacing Situated and Algorithmic Modes of Knowledge Work: A Workplace Jurisdiction Perspective
- Artificial Intelligence at Work: An Integrative Perspective on the Impact of AI on Workplace Inequality
- To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis
- Fading Memories: The Role of Machine Learning in Organizational Knowledge Depreciation
- Algorithmic Recommendation Tools and Experiential Learning in Clinical Care
Boundaries
Limitations & independence
Recorded at coding time, carried with the work forever. A claim without its limits is not evidence.
Recorded limitations
- Abstract-level evidence only; no full text inspected
- Bound from an already-retained journal-query response containing multiple works; no post-audit refetch
- Abstract-level Crossref metadata only; full text was not inspected.
- The publisher surface was not queried after the lane’s quarantined dynamic-challenge response; no independent publisher-page verification was attempted.
Source independence
publisher-only